Comparative study of aluminum diethylphosphinate and aluminum methylethylphosphinate‐filled epoxy flame‐retardant composites

Abstract

AbstractEpoxy resin (EP) is one of the main polymers in electrical and electronic applications. In this work, flame‐retardant epoxy resin composites based on aluminum diethylphosphinate (Al(DEP)) and aluminum methylethylphosphinate (Al(MEP) were prepared using aromatic amine 4, 4‐diaminodiphenylmethane as curing agent. The flammability, thermal degradation, flexural properties, and morphologies of composites were investigated with respect to the filler loading and filler type. Results showed that both Al(MEP) and Al(DEP) were efficient flame retardants for EP and a low dosage (15 wt%) is enough to achieve the important criterion UL 94 V‐0. Limiting oxygen index (LOI) of composites is increased with filler loading (phosphorus content) and reached of 32.2% for 15 wt% of Al(MEP) and 29.8 for 15 wt% of Al(DEP). The char formation and flexural modulus of composites are also improved by adding the two fillers. However, the flexural strength of all the composites decreased with increasing filler loading. In comparison with Al(DEP)/EP, Al(MEP)/EP provides a higher flammability, better thermal stability and char formation but inferior flexural properties. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the dispersion of Al(DEP) filler in the EP matrix is more uniform and exhibits better compatibility with EP matrix, which in turn generates better flexural strength and higher modulus when compared with Al(MEP)‐filled EP composites. POLYM. COMPOS., 2012. © 2012 Society of Plastics Engineers