Abstract

Culture systems as models for disease are only valid as long as they are comparable to in vivo conditions. The phenotype of cultured endothelial cells (ECs) has only been sporadically compared to the corresponding phenotype in vivo. Thus, we compared by immunolocalization the endothelial expression of ICAM-1, VCAM, and E-selectin in vivo in stimulated/unstimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) as a model for macrovascular ECs and stimulated/unstimulated HPMEC (human pulmonary microvessel endothelial cells) as a model for pulmonary microvascular ECs with that in human lungs in vivo (normal and ARDS). Proinflammatory stimuli in vitro were used to stimulate conditions relevant for ARDS. ICAM-1 expression in stimulated HUVEC/HPMEC correlated well with in vivo expression (macro- and microvessels). For E-selectin, the staining pattern in macro/microvessels correlated moderately with unstimulated and well with stimulated HUVEC/HPMEC. For VCAM a good correlation was found for stimulated/unstimulated HUVEC and unstimulated HPMEC. The expression patterns in stimulated HUVEC corresponded well for all three molecules with those in vivo. Thus, the expression patterns in vitro are only partially transferable to in vivo conditions. The study suggests that E-selectin- and VCAM-coated beads could potentially serve in the isolation process of arteriolar and venular ECs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.