Comparative Study between Percutaneous Approach and Transurethral Approach for Treatment of Urinary Bladder Stones

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to compare outcome of percutaneous cystolithotripsy approach (pccl) vs transurethral cystolithotripsy approach (tucl) in treatment of large urinary bladder stones regarding efficacy, safety and peri-operative complications. Methods This study included 60 patients who had urinary bladder stone, treated at Ain Shams University hospitals in Egypt from March 2019 to March 2020 and randomly assigned into two groups: group A: percutaneous cystolithotripsy (PCCL) and group B: transurethral using nephroscope combined with meurmayer stone punch (tucl). Baseline and perioperative data were recorded and compared between two groups. Results Baseline parameters and the peri-operative complications (fever, transient haematuria, urinary bladder perforation, suprapubic wound infection and persistent leakage from suprapubic site) were compared between the two groups. Complete stone clearance was achieved in all the patients. The mean operative time in pccl group and tucl group was (30±7 min and 32±7 min) respectively. Urinary catheter duration in Pccl group was significantly more than Tucl group. Till the last follow-up, 6.6% patients (n = 2) developed urethral stricture in Tucl group. Conclusions PCCL is a safe procedure with acceptable morbidity and can be used as an alternative to tucl in treating (2-4 cm) urinary bladder stones.