Comparative seismic performance evaluation of friction, self-centering and hybrid self-centering dampers

Abstract

This study explores comparative seismic performance of a shape memory alloy (SMA)-only device, a friction damper, and a hybrid self-centering device. The self-centering device considered in this study, named as superelastic friction dampers (SFDs), is a hybrid damper operating on a mechanism where SMA cables and frictional components are arranged in parallel. A detailed description of the device and an experimental characterization of mechanical behavior are presented first. Then, an 8-story archetype steel frame building is designed and modeled with each seismic protection device (SMA-only, hybrid self-centering, and friction only). To enable comparative performance assessment, each device is designed to have similar initial stiffness and the same maximum force at design displacement. Nonlinear time history analyses are conducted using a total of 44 ground motion records. The results are evaluated to compare performance of each frame design at design-basis and maximum considered earthquake hazard levels. Next, a risk-based seismic hazard demand analysis framework that involves comprehensive incremental dynamic analyses is employed for further assessing the performance of each system. The experimental results validate the parallel working mechanism of SMA cables and frictional components in the SFD, with 90% of the damper deformations recovered. Comparative analysis of seismic responses demonstrates the excellent performance of the SFDs in reducing interstory drift ratio, residual interstory drift ratio, and absolute acceleration responses. Furthermore, fragility analysis and risk-based seismic hazard assessment further reveal that the SFDs provide a well-balanced combination of energy dissipation capability and self-centering ability, thereby enhancing the seismic resilience of structures.