Abstract

Although the two parallel architectural forms, Han Buddhists and the Cistercian monasteries, seem, on the surface, to be very different—belonging to different religions, different cultural backgrounds, and different ways of construction—they share many similarities in the internal institutional model of monks’ lives and the corresponding architectural core values. The worship space plays the most significant role in both monastic life and layout. In this study, the Three Temples of Guoqing Si and the Church of the Royal Abbey of Santa Maria de Poblet are used as examples to elucidate the connotations behind the architectural forms, in order to further explore how worship spaces serve as an intermediary between deities, monks, and pilgrims. Based on field research and experience of monastic life, this comparative study highlights two fundamental similarities between the Three Temples and the Church: First, both worship spaces are derived from imperial prototypes, have a similar priority of construction, occupy the most important place in both sacred venues, and both serve as a reference for the development of monastic layout. Second, both worship spaces are composed of a similar programmed functional layout, including similar space dominators as well as itineraries. Beyond the surface similarities, this article further analyzes the reasons behind the three differences found. Due to their different understanding of deities, both worship spaces show different ways of worship, images of deities, and distances towards them.

Highlights

  • Since Chinese scholars first began to investigate Buddhist architectures in China (Liang 1961), the central axis has always been considered as a key issue

  • Before discussing the worship spaces in the Guoqing Monastery and the Royal Abbey of Santa Maria de Poblet, it is fundamental to consider the following: Why have Han Buddhist and Cistercian monastic traditions been selected as the foci of this comparative analysis?

  • The way that worship spaces connect to the rest of the monastic layouts are mainly reflected in the following three aspects: open and closed, void and solid, disappearing and emphasizing

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From its evolution and formation (Wang and Xu 2011), speculation on the basic spatial sequence (Su 2009), space configuration (Wang and Lu 2000), and its role in the development of the whole monastic layout (Wang 2016), it has emerged as a fundamental unit in Buddhist monasteries. It has always received great attention through records (Liang 1932), drawing (Liang and Fairbank 1984; Zhang 2012), and mapping

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call