Comparative protective effects of HI-6 and MMB-4 against organophosphorous nerve agent poisoning

Abstract

The oximes pralidoxime (2-PAM), its dimethanesulphonate salt derivative P2S, and obidoxime (toxogonin) are currently licensed and fielded for the treatment of chemical warfare (CW) organophosphorous (OP) nerve agent poisoning. While they are effective against several of the identified threat CW OP agents, they have little efficacy against others such as soman (GD) and cyclosarin (CF). In addition, they are also significantly less effective than other investigational oximes against the nerve agent known as Russian VX (RVX). Among the oximes currently being investigated, two in particular, HI-6 (asoxime) and MMB-4 (ICD-039, methoxime) have been proposed as replacement therapies for the currently licensed oximes. HI-6 has been safely used in individuals to treat OP insecticide poisoning, as well as in human volunteers, although its efficacy against OP nerve agent poisoning in humans cannot be demonstrated due to ethical considerations. It is currently available for use in defined military settings in Canada, Sweden and the Czech Republic, and is also under development in a number of other countries. The oxime MMB-4 has not yet been studied clinically, but is fielded by the Czech Republic, and is being developed by the United States armed services as a replacement for the currently fielded 2-PAM. This review compares the effectiveness of HI-6 and MMB-4 against nerve agent threats where comparisons can be made. HI-6 has been demonstrated to be generally a superior reactivator of nerve agent inhibited enzyme, particularly with human and non-human primate derived enzyme, and has also shown better protective effects against the lethality of most OP agents in a variety of species. Both compounds appear to be clearly superior to the available oximes, obidoxime and 2-PAM.