Abstract

The development of accurate flood prediction model could reduce number of fatalities by assisting local government in decision making. In this paper, three well-known machine learning algorithms, including Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, and Lasso, are compared in terms of flood prediction accuracy. The selected algorithms are applied to learn flood prediction models for six U.S. Geological Survey gauges in North Texas. Three data sets from different sources had been used to learn flood prediction models. The data sets include Water level time series from gauges, spatio-temporal precipitation from National Weather Service’s Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler, and hydrological data from Hydrology Laboratory-Distributed Hydrologic Model. Although Support Vector Machine usually performs well in many applications, the results suggest that Lasso is the most appropriate for flood prediction while Support Vector Machine performs the worst.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.