Comparative phylogenetic analysis of aquaporins provides insight into the gene family expansion and evolution in plants and their role in drought tolerant and susceptible chickpea cultivars

Abstract

Aquaporins (AQPs) are water channel proteins that play a significant role in drought stress. Although the AQPs identified in multiple plant species, there is no detailed evolutionary and comparative study of AQPs regarding chickpea plant. The current study involved evolutionary analyses coupled with promoter and expression analyses of chickpea AQPs (CaAQPs). A total of 924 non-redundant AQPs were studied in 24 plant species including algae, mosses, lycophytes, monocots and dicots. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a clear divergence of eight AQP subfamilies (LIPs, SIPs, GIPs, NIPs, XIPs, PIPs, HIPs and TIPs). The comparative phylogenetic trees of AQP subfamilies among Arabidopsis, soybean, common bean, maize and chickpea demonstrated that the AQPs were highly species-specific. Interestingly, the dual NPA motif was conserved in all species. However, the ar/R selectivity filter signatures [W/T/S/N/G/A]-[V/S/L/I/A]-[S/G/A]-R (in NIPs), F-H-T-R (in PIPs), [H/N/Q/S]-[A/I/L/S/V]-[A/G]-[A/C/L/M/R/V] (in TIPs) and [V/I/L/M]-[V/I/A/F/M]-[A/S/F/C]-[N/F/L/I/A/S (in SIPs) were found in five species. Moreover, the Froger's positions (P1-P5) were found as [F/L/Y]-[S/T]-A-Y-[L/I/M/V/F] (in NIPs), [Q/E/M]-S-A-F-W (in PIPs), [A/L/S/T/V]-[A/C/N/S/T/V]-[P/R/S]-[Y/N/F]-[W/Q] (in TIPs) and [I/M/F]-[A/V]-[A/V]-Y-W (in SIPs). The MEME motif analyses showed that most of the motifs were specific to subfamily and subgroups. Tissue-specific expression profiling of CaAQPs revealed that CaTIPs and CaPIPs are highly expressed in most of the tissues, while CaNIPs and CaSIPs have low expression. In promoter analysis of CaAQPs, multiple stress-related cis-acting elements e.g. MYB, MYC, ABRE, etc. were found. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed that CaPIP2;3 and CaNIP3;1 are positive regulator, while CaSIP1;1 and CaPIP2;1 have a negative role in drought tolerance. The findings and implications of this study are discussed in detail.