Comparative performance of prediction model, non-expert and telediagnosis of common external and middle ear disease using a patient cohort from Cambodia that included one hundred and thirty-eight ears.

Abstract

Efforts to combat the large global burden of ear and hearing disorders are hampered by poor availability of expert diagnosis We report the first study to directly compare prediction model, non-expert and tele-diagnosis of middle and external ear disorders. A prediction model based upon a novel automated otological symptom questionnaire performed poorly, but absence of otorrhoea was found to reliably exclude a diagnosis of chronic suppurative otitis media. Both on-site non-expert and expert tele-diagnosis had high diagnostic specificity, but low sensitivity. Future work could explore how the validity of these diagnostic methods may be improved.