Abstract

BackgroundCellulases and related hydrolytic enzymes represent a key cost factor for biochemical conversion of cellulosic biomass feedstocks to sugars for biofuels and chemicals production. The US Department of Energy (DOE) is cost sharing projects to decrease the cost of enzymes for biomass saccharification. The performance of benchmark cellulase preparations produced by Danisco, DSM, Novozymes and Verenium to convert pretreated corn stover (PCS) cellulose to glucose was evaluated under common experimental conditions and is reported here in a non-attributed manner.ResultsTwo hydrolysis modes were examined, enzymatic hydrolysis (EH) of PCS whole slurry or washed PCS solids at pH 5 and 50°C, and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) of washed PCS solids at pH 5 and 38°C. Enzymes were dosed on a total protein mass basis, with protein quantified using both the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay and the Bradford assay. Substantial differences were observed in absolute cellulose to glucose conversion performance levels under the conditions tested. Higher cellulose conversion yields were obtained using washed solids compared to whole slurry, and estimated enzyme protein dosages required to achieve a particular cellulose conversion to glucose yield were extremely dependent on the protein assay used. All four enzyme systems achieved glucose yields of 90% of theoretical or higher in SSF mode. Glucose yields were reduced in EH mode, with all enzymes achieving glucose yields of at least 85% of theoretical on washed PCS solids and 75% in PCS whole slurry. One of the enzyme systems ('enzyme B') exhibited the best overall performance. However in attaining high conversion yields at lower total enzyme protein loadings, the relative and rank ordered performance of the enzyme systems varied significantly depending upon which hydrolysis mode and protein assay were used as the basis for comparison.ConclusionsThis study provides extensive information about the performance of four precommercial cellulase preparations. Though test conditions were not necessarily optimal for some of the enzymes, all were able to effectively saccharify PCS cellulose. Large differences in the estimated enzyme dosage requirements depending on the assay used to measure protein concentration highlight the need for better consensus methods to quantify enzyme protein.

Highlights

  • Cellulases and related hydrolytic enzymes represent a key cost factor for biochemical conversion of cellulosic biomass feedstocks to sugars for biofuels and chemicals production

  • The objective of this study was to characterize the performance of four benchmark cellulose preparations under common hydrolysis reaction conditions using a standard pretreated biomass substrate: National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) dilute acid pretreated corn stover (PCS)

  • Shake flask scale experiments were conducted to develop dosage response curves for each enzyme acting in both simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) and enzymatic hydrolysis only (EH) reaction modes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cellulases and related hydrolytic enzymes represent a key cost factor for biochemical conversion of cellulosic biomass feedstocks to sugars for biofuels and chemicals production. The major front-end conversion steps in biochemical platform-based production of cellulosic biofuels are pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis [1,2,3]. Together, these steps work to breakdown the cellulose and hemicellulose found in the cell walls of plants (biomass) to simple sugars (’saccharification’). These steps work to breakdown the cellulose and hemicellulose found in the cell walls of plants (biomass) to simple sugars (’saccharification’) These sugars can be converted into biofuel, nominally by fermentation to ethanol, a variety of other fuel molecules can be produced from such sugars. The process configuration for enzymatic hydrolysis can be standalone (that is, in the context of an overall process based on sequential hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF)) or it can be combined with fermentation (that is, in the context of an overall process based on simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation (SSCF)), or it can be some hybrid variation falling inbetween SHF and SSCF [9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.