Comparative performance of COVID-19 serology testing

Abstract

BackgroundThe 2019 novel coronavirus infectious disease (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a surge of assays aimed at detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) – coronavirus (CoV) – 2 infection and prior exposure. Although both molecular and antigen testing have clearly defined uses, the utility of serology remains uncertain and is presently not recommended for assessing immunity. MethodsWe conducted a pragmatic, observational study evaluating four commercially available emergency use authorized laboratory-based COVID-19 serology assays (Assays A–D). Remnant samples from hospitalized, and non-hospitalized SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients, as well as vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals were collected and tested. Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. Antibody concentrations were compared across the platforms and populations. ResultsA total of 588 remnant samples derived from 500 patients were tested. PPA at 5–12 weeks post-PCR positive results for Assays A-D was 98.3, 97.4, 99.2, and 95.8% respectively. NPA was 100% across all platforms. Mean antibody concentrations at 2–4 weeks post-PCR positive result were significantly higher in hospitalized versus non-hospitalized patients, respectively, for Assay A (131.8 [101.7] vs. 95.6 [100.3] AU/mL, P < 0.001), B (61.7 [62.4] vs. 38.1 [40.5] AU/mL, P < 0.001), and C (157.6 [105.3] vs. 133.3 [100.7] AU/mL, P < 0.001). For individuals receiving two vaccine doses mean antibody concentrations were respectively 169.6 (104.4), 27.3 (50.8), 189.6 (120.9), 21.19 (13.1) AU/mL for Assays A-D. ConclusionsOverall, PPA and NPA differed across the four assays. Assays A and C produced higher PPA and NPA and detected larger concentrations of antibodies following vaccination.