Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routing Algorithms in IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.11 with Different Ad Hoc Routing Protocol

Anitha Anitha

doi:10.3844/jcssp.2011.731.735

Abstract

Problem statement: Wireless ADHOC networks are self organized dynamic networks can share wireless channel without any established central control standard for IEEE 802.11. Approach: The most common protocols are AODV, DSDV, DSR in ADHOC used to ensure the data transmission among themselves. To meet the need of low power and low cost IEEE 802.15.4 standard was developed for sensor networks. Results: Aim of the study is develop an Ad hoc routing protocol in IEEE 802.15.4 this will give more performance in the order of the low cost, low power, guarantee data transmission in routing than IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN and also we address the comparison and performance analysis also measure the impact of these two standards how ADHOC routing protocols perform in sensor networks. Conclusion/Recommendations: At this point we address the comparison and performance analysis also measure the impact of these two standards in wireless technology.

Highlights

Wireless networks provide advantages in size, deployment, cost and distributed intelligence compared with wired networks
Wireless technology enables users to set up a network quickly, and enables them to set up a network where it is inconvenient or impossible to wire cables
We have developed a set of performance metrics techniques the overall network energy consumption for comparing different routing algorithms including varies as per different standards

Summary

Introduction

Wireless networks provide advantages in size, deployment, cost and distributed intelligence compared with wired networks. Wireless technology enables users to set up a network quickly, and enables them to set up a network where it is inconvenient or impossible to wire cables. The “care free” feature and convenience of deployment make a wireless network more cost-efficient than a wired network in general. On-demand or reactive and Table driven or proactive protocols. The route path established only when a node has data packets to send by means of the best known protocol of On-Demandreactive protocols are AODV, DSR. In contrast the proactive routing protocols constantly update in spite of the traffic activity in the network. Each node generates control packets periodically by the way of topology changes.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion