Comparative performance analysis of precise point positioning technique in the UAV − based mapping

Abstract

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry is a very efficient, low-cost approach for mapping small or medium-sized local areas. This approach is adequate for achieving the needed accuracy in many applications, and onboard positioning sensors have made this technique more feasible by decreasing the need for ground control stations (GCPs). When real-time positioning strategies are used, photogrammetric mapping can also be performed instantaneously in the field. This is especially crucial in applications like disaster management, where current situation must be detected rapidly. It is critical to choose a georeferencing approach in applications that is appropriate for the physical parameters of the mapping area, the intended use of the photogrammetric mapping, and the needed accuracy. In order to accurately georeference the photogrammetric outputs, this study assesses the real-time and post-processed performances of absolute and relative GNSS positioning approaches. Finally, it compares these strategies in terms of the position accuracy of the created models. In the evaluations, the 3D models of the study area were created utilizing network-based Real Time Kinematic (n-RTK), Post-Processed Kinematic (PPK) Positioning, and Precise Point Positioning (PPP) approaches, with direct georeferencing of the UAV-based photogrammetric images. These models were then compared to models developed using traditional indirect georeferencing with GCPs and aided indirect georeferencing. According to the findings, direct georeferencing using the n-RTK and PPK techniques provided a horizontal position accuracy in terms of root mean square errors (rms2D = 1.6 cm and 1.9 cm) almost equal to indirect georeferencing using GCPs (rms2D = 1.9 cm). In terms of vertical position accuracies, the n-RTK and PPK approaches in direct georeferencing (rmsh = 3.7 cm and 3.9 cm, respectively) produced rather different results than the GCPs-based conventional strategy (rmsh = 1.6 cm), although the discrepancies were within acceptable error limits. Direct georeferencing with the PPP approach produced the lowest horizontal and vertical position accuracies (rms2D = 5.9 cm, rmsh= 5.7 cm). However, this level of accuracy was deemed adequate for use in large-scale mapping in Turkey's authorized regulation.