Abstract
A comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) was carried out on a set of aligned quinine-based stationary phase molecules used in enantioselective chromatography. The best QSAR derived has a cross-validated (predictive) r(2)(cv) = 0.671 and a normal r(2) = 0.998. For CoMFAs using both steric and electrostatic fields as descriptors, the steric field descriptors explained more than 91% of the variance while the electrostatic descriptors explained less than 9% of the variance. It is concluded that the long-range electrostatic potential surrounding the positively charged CSPs are not enantiodiscriminating, while the van der Waals and local electrostatic surface features of these CSPs are highly discriminating. Quantum mechanical calculations back up this claim by showing a relatively symmetric electrostatic iso-contour surface. From the QSAR derived here, a region around the carbamate moiety was located where placement of steric bulk is predicted to enhance chiral discrimination. A set of possible synthetic target molecules is presented.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.