Abstract

BackgroundDecomposition of biomass for biogas production can be practiced under wet and dry fermentation conditions. In contrast to the dry fermentation technology, wet fermentation is characterized by a high liquid content and a relatively low total solid content. In this study, the composition and functional potential of a biogas-producing microbial community in an agricultural biogas reactor operating under wet fermentation conditions was analyzed by a metagenomic approach applying 454-pyrosequencing. The obtained metagenomic dataset and corresponding 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences were compared to the previously sequenced comparable metagenome from a dry fermentation process, meeting explicitly identical boundary conditions regarding sample and community DNA preparation, sequencing technology, processing of sequence reads and data analyses by bioinformatics tools.ResultsHigh-throughput metagenome sequencing of community DNA from the wet fermentation process applying the pyrosequencing approach resulted in 1,532,780 reads, with an average read length of 397 bp, accounting for approximately 594 million bases of sequence information in total. Taxonomic comparison of the communities from wet and dry fermentation revealed similar microbial profiles with Bacteria being the predominant superkingdom, while the superkingdom Archaea was less abundant. In both biogas plants, the bacterial phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes and Proteobacteria were identified with descending frequencies. Within the archaeal superkingdom, the phylum Euryarchaeota was most abundant with the dominant class Methanomicrobia. Functional profiles of the communities revealed that environmental gene tags representing methanogenesis enzymes were present in both biogas plants in comparable frequencies. 16S rRNA gene amplicon high-throughput sequencing disclosed differences in the sub-communities comprising methanogenic Archaea between both processes. Fragment recruitments of metagenomic reads to the reference genome of the archaeon Methanoculleus bourgensis MS2T revealed that dominant methanogens within the dry fermentation process were highly related to the reference.ConclusionsAlthough process parameters, substrates and technology differ between the wet and dry biogas fermentations analyzed in this study, community profiles are very similar at least at higher taxonomic ranks, illustrating that core community taxa perform key functions in biomass decomposition and methane synthesis. Regarding methanogenesis, Archaea highly related to the type strain M. bourgensis MS2T dominate the dry fermentation process, suggesting the adaptation of members belonging to this species to specific fermentation process parameters.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-014-0193-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Decomposition of biomass for biogas production can be practiced under wet and dry fermentation conditions

  • Analyzed biogas production plants differ in substrate input and chemical parameters To compare taxonomic and functional profiles of the biogas-producing microbial communities from productionscale biogas plants operating under dry or wet fermentation conditions, samples from the primary digesters of two agricultural biogas plants differing in these fermentation types were analyzed

  • The biogas plant operating under dry fermentation conditions (BGP_DF) was sampled previously [16], whereas samples from the biogas plant operating under wet fermentation conditions (BGP_WF) were taken in March 2011

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Decomposition of biomass for biogas production can be practiced under wet and dry fermentation conditions. The process of biogas production takes place under anaerobic conditions and involves microbial decomposition of organic matter, yielding methane as the main final product of underlying metabolic pathways. Complex consortia of microorganisms are responsible for biomass decomposition and biogas production involving the stages substrate hydrolysis, acidogenesis, acetogenesis and methanogenesis. Most of these microbes, as well as their roles in biogas production, are currently unknown. The analysis of the structure, composition and activity of microbial communities in relation to input substrates and fermentation parameters in biogas plants have become the focus of research [5,6,7]. To increase the yield of biogas, a detailed insight into relevant microbial metabolic pathways involved in methane synthesis and syntrophy is necessary

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.