Abstract

COMPARATIVE LITERARY HISTORY Modernist Futures: Innovation and Inheritance in Contemporary Novel by David James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. 223. $95.00 cloth.The scope of David James's new study, Modernist Futures, begins with a poignant question of interest to those scholars invested in both literary history and criticism: What does it really mean to consider that any given movement may also have a replenished moment, a phase of re-emergence-in another time, for another culture-through which its promise obtains renewed pertinence? (1). To begin this inquiry, James suggests redefining terminal point of literary modernism. James does not view postwar period or rise of postmodern experimentation as last boundary of modernism. Instead, James demonstrates how contemporary novelists, through their complex relationship to and literary inheritance, have become successors of modernism, suggesting that project of is not yet finished, thereby offering his readers an example of what long modernism may look like (418).1 His contribution thus addresses charge set forth by Douglas Mao and Rebecca L. Walkowitz in New Modernist Studies- that is, to map expansive tendency of as it moves outward in spatial, and vertical directions in creating its canon (737).2 Whereas Mao and Walkowitz's own survey of this expansion problematically neglects temporal, work done by James recuperates this elision; Modemist Futures clearly articulates how literary historians and scholars in both New Modernist studies and contemporary literature can advance their own critical practices by examining parallels between and contemporary fiction. The comparative nature of this study suggests a rethinking of literary history as James considers how and why today partakes of an interaction between innovation and inheritance that is entirely consonant with what modernists themselves were doing more than a century ago, an interaction that enables writers to work with their lineage in process of attempting new experiments with form (2). James names these authors as successors of modernism: Philip Roth, Milan Kundera, Michael Ondaatje, J. M. Coetzee, Ian McEwan, and Toni Morrison.To justify this selection, James introduces a concept called the ethics of reading through which he seeks to pinpoint writers whose reinvestment in has enabled them to rethink very role that rhetorical reflexivity might play in narratives that provoke our ethical engagement (18). How these novelists stylistically and thematically engage with topics of sexual violence, racial injustice, and political oppression becomes one vehicle that James uses to articulate responsibility that novel and its readers have to world at large, and thus unites these chosen authors. Rather than turning toward postmodern era's overreliance on irony, parody, or nonlinear page design to create self-reflection, these contemporary novelists reinvigorate novel's capacity to engage with changing socio-political environments by returning to modernist forms of self-interrogation (99). The following claim, made in reference to McEwan, illustrates this ethics of reading: He not only raises ethical questions diegetically, by pursuing consequences of characters' moral errors of judgment, but also on a hermeneutic level, as he invites readers at once to contemplate their own expectations of fiction itself as a moral medium and to speculate about nature of authorial accountability (144). Of course, this critical maneuver only enhances what also unites these authors, which is their own critical work on modernism, thus complicating notions of literary heritage. While it may be anathema to suggest that contemporary novelist can be also classified as modernist, since that very movement established itself through its own rupture from tradition and its revolution of literary forms and style, James fashions a link between two by demonstrating complexity of a notion such as inheritance, leaving open question of whether modernist inheritance is embraced consistently and knowingly by contemporary novelist. …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call