Abstract
In this work, we selectively prepared two samples with quite different nanocrystal shapes, i.e. nanoplates and nanograins but with almost identical surface areas to make a clear comparison of nanocrystal shapes on electrochemical performance. The electrochemical results indicate that the thinner hexagonal α-Fe2O3 nanoplates considerably enclosed by two larger (0001) basal surfaces exhibit higher capacity and stability than thicker α-Fe2O3 nanograins enclosed by a variety of crystal facets. During the conversion reaction, an orientated growth of porous nanostructure with orientated nanowalls as a stable framework is observed for the nanoplate, readily supplying a pathway for long and easy lithiation-delithiation cycling. The improved electrochemical performance of α-Fe2O3 nanoplates is surely related to the nanostructure with significantly stacked (0001) lattice planes along [0001] direction for orientated growth of γ-Fe2O3 nanodomains along one [111] direction.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.