Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem against aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens from patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections

Abstract

This study compared the in vitro activities of ertapenem (Merck & Co., Inc.), ceftriaxone, amoxicillin-clavulanate, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 518 aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens isolated from 340 patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. Ciprofloxacin was also tested against Gram-negative isolates. Gram-positive cocci accounted for 68.1% of the aerobic bacteria; Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolate (45.6%). The ertapenem MIC was ≤ 2 μg/ml for 80.9% of isolates and ≥ 8 μg/ml for 16.2% (including isolates of enterococci, methicillin-resistant S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria). Against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, ertapenem had the most potent activity. Ertapenem was the most active drug against Enterobacteriaceae (100% susceptible), whereas amoxicillin-clavulanate was least active (66% susceptible). Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active drug against P. aeruginosa (100% susceptible), followed by ciprofloxacin (87% susceptible). In summary, ertapenem was highly active in vitro against many aerobic and facultative bacterial pathogens commonly recovered from patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections.