Abstract

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is known to cause non-scarring alopecia. However, histopathological evaluation is uncommon. The objective of this study was to document the histopathology of non-scarring alopecia and to compare histopathology of alopecic and normal appearing scalp areas in SLE hair loss patients. A cross-sectional comparative evaluation of scalp biopsies from 23 SLE patients; 12 with hair loss and 11 without was conducted over a 7-month period in 2020. A total of 58 scalp biopsies stained with H and E (23 vertical and 35 cross-sectional) were evaluated. Mucin deposit evaluation was done using Alcian blue (pH 2.5). There were no significant differences in the sociodemographic data between the patients. The SLE hair loss patients demonstrated mucin deposition (91.7%), reduced size/number of sebaceous glands (58.3%), epidermal atrophy (50.0%), naked arrector pili muscles (50.0%), lymphocytic infiltration (33.3%), pigment incontinence (16.7%), fibrous stellae (16.7%), increased telogen percentage, and increased terminal versus vellus hair ratios. On comparing the histopathology of those who had hair loss to those without hair loss, the only significant difference was in the number and size of sebaceous gland. There were no significant differences between scalp areas with and without hair loss in the SLE hair loss patients. There are differences in size and number of sebaceous glands on histopathology between SLE patients who have hair loss and those who do not. Also, there are no histopathological differences between alopecic and non-alopecic scalp areas of SLE patient.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.