Comparative geotechnical analysis for ultimate bearing capacity of precast concrete piles using cone resistance measurements

Abstract

Abstract Computing the axial load capacity of pile foundations is often challenging for geotechnical engineers. Different theoretical and empirical approaches were proposed for determining the ultimate bearing capacity. Among these approaches, the in situ testing methods are based on cone penetration test (CPT) measurements. This study compares five CPT methods in estimating the axial load capacity of precast concrete piles evaluated at four piling construction projects in Northwest and Central Florida. The analytical methods used in this work are the Aoki and De Alencar method (1975), the Schmertmann method (1978), the Bustamante and Gianeselli Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chausees method (1982), the Eslami and Fellenius method (1997), and the Eurocode 7 (2007). The outcomes indicated that the Eurocode method 7 had the most increased load capacity estimates, whereas the Eslami and Fellenius method yielded the lowest estimates. The results also indicated that the Aoki and De Alencar (1975) method consistently demonstrated the slightest differences among these values, showing its potential for reliable and consistent pile-bearing capacity estimations.