Abstract

BackgroundMembers of the Bifidobacteriaceae family represent both dominant microbial groups that colonize the gut of various animals, especially during the suckling stage of their life, while they also occur as pathogenic bacteria of the urogenital tract. The pan-genome of the genus Bifidobacterium has been explored in detail in recent years, though genomics of the Bifidobacteriaceae family has not yet received much attention. Here, a comparative genomic analyses of 67 Bifidobacteriaceae (sub) species including all currently recognized genera of this family, i.e., Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, Bombiscardovia, Gardnerella, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia, was performed. Furthermore, in order to include a representative of each of the 67 (currently recognized) (sub) species belonging to the Bifidobacteriaceae family, we sequenced the genomes of an additional 11 species from this family, accomplishing the most extensive comparative genomic analysis performed within this family so far.ResultsPhylogenomics-based analyses revealed the deduced evolutionary pathway followed by each member of the Bifidobacteriaceae family, highlighting Aeriscardovia aeriphila LMG 21773 as the deepest branch in the evolutionary tree of this family. Furthermore, functional analyses based on genome content unveil connections between a given member of the family, its carbohydrate utilization abilities and its corresponding host. In this context, bifidobacterial (sub) species isolated from humans and monkeys possess the highest relative number of acquired glycosyl hydrolase-encoding genes, probably in order to enhance their metabolic ability to utilize different carbon sources consumed by the host.ConclusionsWithin the Bifidobacteriaceae family, genomics of the genus Bifidobacterium has been extensively investigated. In contrast, very little is known about the genomics of members of the other eight genera of this family. In this study, we decoded the genome sequences of each member of the Bifidobacteriaceae family. Thanks to subsequent comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses, the deduced pan-genome of this family, as well as the predicted evolutionary development of each taxon belonging to this family was assessed.

Highlights

  • Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae family represent both dominant microbial groups that colonize the gut of various animals, especially during the suckling stage of their life, while they occur as pathogenic bacteria of the urogenital tract

  • 100202, Bifidobacterium lemurum DSM 28807, Bifidobacterium myosotis DSM 100196 and Bifidobacterium tissieri DSM 100201, as well as five chromosomes belonging to different genera of the Bifidobacteriaceae family, including Aeriscardovia aeriphila LMG 21773, Alloscardovia macacae DSM 24762, Bombiscardovia coagulans DSM 22924 and Pseudoscardovia radai DSM

  • Very little is known about the genomics of other members of the Bifidobacteriaceae family, which include apart from the Bifidobacterium genus eight additional genera

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Members of the Bifidobacteriaceae family represent both dominant microbial groups that colonize the gut of various animals, especially during the suckling stage of their life, while they occur as pathogenic bacteria of the urogenital tract. A comparative genomic analyses of 67 Bifidobacteriaceae (sub) species including all currently recognized genera of this family, i.e., Aeriscardovia, Alloscardovia, Bifidobacterium, Bombiscardovia, Gardnerella, Neoscardovia, Parascardovia, Pseudoscardovia and Scardovia, was performed. A novel, yet unculturable species was identified from termites and included in the Bifidobacteriaceae family with the taxonomic denomination of ‘Candidatus Ancillula trichonymphae’ [4] The name of this latter organism originates from a variety of flagellates of the genus Trichonympha, of which this strain is symbiont [4]. Bifidobacteriaceae are chemoorganotrophs with a fermentative type of metabolism, Gram-positive, nonspore-forming, non-motile, and anaerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria [5] They reside in different ecological niches, such as the human and animal gastrointestinal tract (GIT), oral cavity and the (social) insect gut [6], while they may be found in blood and sewage, possibly due to environmental contamination. In contrast to bifidobacteria, which mainly include strict anaerobes with some exceptions, such as Bifidobacterium animalis subsp

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.