Comparative genomic analysis of Escherichia coli strains obtained from continuous imipenem stress evolution.

Abstract

The carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli has aroused increasing attention worldwide, especially in terms of imipenem (IMP) resistance. The molecular mechanism of IMP resistance remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the resistance mechanisms of IMP in E. coli. Susceptible Sx181-0-1 strain was induced into resistance strains by adaptive laboratory evolution. The drug resistance spectrum was measured using the disk diffusion and microbroth dilution methods. Whole-genome sequencing and resequencing were used to analyze the nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) between the primary susceptible strain and resistant strains. The expression levels of these genes with nsSNPs were identified by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Resistance phenotype appeared in the induced 15th generation (induction time=183h). Sx181-32 and Sx181-256, which had the minimum inhibitory concentrations of IMP of 8 and 64µg ml-1, were isolated during continuous subculture exposed to increasing concentrations of IMP, respectively. A total of 19 nsSNPs were observed both in Sx181-32 and Sx181-256, distributed in rpsU, sdaC, zwf, ttuC, araJ, dacC, mrdA, secF, dacD, lpxD, mrcB, ftsI, envZ, and two unknown function genes (orf01892 and orf01933). Among these 15 genes, five genes (dacC, mrdA, lpxD, mrcB, and ftsI) were mainly involved in cell wall synthesis. The mrdA (V338A, L378P, and M574I) and mrcB (P784L, A736V, and T708A) had three amino acid substitutions, respectively. The expression levels of rpsU, ttuC, and orf01933 were elevated in both Sx181-32 and Sx181-256 compared to Sx181-0-1. The expression levels of these genes were elevated in Sx181-256, except for araJ. Bacteria developed resistance to antimicrobials by regulating various biological processes, among which the most involved is the cell wall synthesis (dacC, mrdA, lpxD, mrcB, and ftsI). The combination mutations of mrdA, envZ, and ftsI genes may increase the resistance to IMP. Our study could improve the understanding of the molecular mechanism of IMP resistance in E. coli.