Abstract

Several recent studies have documented considerable intraspecific and intrapopulation ecological variation in primates. However, we generally lack an understanding of how such variability may be linked to concomitant demographic variation among groups or populations of the same species, particularly in regard to large-bodied and wide-ranging species with high ecological flexibility, such as chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). We compared the feeding ecology of chimpanzees inhabiting 2 sites in Kibale National Park, Uganda that differ 3-fold in chimpanzee density and support notably different plant communities. Chimpanzees at Ngogo, a site with the largest known chimpanzee community and unusually high chimpanzee density, spent a significantly lower percentage of time resting (and pregnant and lactating females spent more time feeding), incorporated higher percentages of ripe fruit in their diet, had lower dietary diversity values, and had shorter and less variable average patch residency times than did their counterparts at the nearby Kanyawara site, which supports a relatively low density of chimpanzees. In addition, feeding party size was significantly and positively related to feeding patch size at Ngogo, but not at Kanyawara. Together these findings aid in explaining the noted disparity in chimpanzee community size and density between Ngogo and Kanyawara by suggesting that the diet of Ngogo chimpanzees is of higher overall quality than that of Kanyawara chimpanzees. They also highlight the potentially profound influence of even small-scale habitat heterogeneity on the ecology of primates. Researchers must take such influences into account when attempting to draw conclusions about species- or population-level characteristics.

Highlights

  • Recent studies of feeding ecology in primates have documented considerable intraspecific dietary variation in several species, e.g., Gorilla gorilla beringei: Watts (1996); Procolobus tephrosceles: Chapman and Chapman (1999); Cercopithecus spp.: Glenn and Cords (2002); Colobus guereza: Harris and Chapman (2007)

  • Based on the limited data that are available, it is clear that noteworthy variation in diet and habitat use in primates exists between populations of the same species, and among social groups of the same population, e.g., Colobus guereza (Harris and Chapman 2007) and Cercopithecus mitis (Butynski 1990) in Kibale National Park, Uganda; Gorilla beringei beringei in Bwindi National Park, Uganda (Ganas et al 2004), Hapalemur griseus in Ranomafana National Park, Madagascar (Grassi 2006), in highly heterogeneous environments, e.g., Lemur catta in Beza Mahafaly, Madagascar (Yamashita 2002)

  • While data indicate that feeding ecology and habitat use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) vary considerably across populations, e.g., Gombe: Wrangham (1977); Lopé: Tutin et al (1991); Bossou: Yamakoshi (1998); Budongo: Newton-Fisher (1999); Kibale: Wrangham (2000); Kahuzi-Biega: Basabose (2002), few comparative data exist regarding the extent of diversity within populations, and how such diversity may be tied to differences among communities in size and density

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent studies of feeding ecology in primates have documented considerable intraspecific dietary variation in several species, e.g., Gorilla gorilla beringei: Watts (1996); Procolobus tephrosceles: Chapman and Chapman (1999); Cercopithecus spp.: Glenn and Cords (2002); Colobus guereza: Harris and Chapman (2007). While data indicate that feeding ecology and habitat use of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) vary considerably across populations, e.g., Gombe: Wrangham (1977); Lopé: Tutin et al (1991); Bossou: Yamakoshi (1998); Budongo: Newton-Fisher (1999); Kibale: Wrangham (2000); Kahuzi-Biega: Basabose (2002), few comparative data exist regarding the extent of diversity within populations, and how such diversity may be tied to differences among communities in size and density. Previous research on the feeding ecology of the Kanyawara community (Isabirye-Basuta 1987, 1988; Conklin-Brittain et al 1998; Wrangham et al 1998), more limited analysis on the ecology of the Ngogo community (Ghiglieri 1984; Mitani et al 2002), and general comparisons of the dietary profiles of the 2 communities (Wrangham et al 1991), combined with the botanical differences noted in the preceding text, suggest that the Kibale population provides a unique opportunity to address the extent to which chimpanzee ecology may vary over small spatial scales

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call