Abstract
ABSTRACT Paddy was soaked with up to 30% moisture, and hot water soaking (35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60 °C) was compared to cold soaking (CS) and submerged aerated soaking (SAS) in terms of the parameters of the paddy grain and the effluent. The investigation demonstrated that hot water soaking yielded the highest total solids (TS) (1.946 ± 0.045 g/L), total dissolved solids (TDS) (1.724 ± 0.013 g/L), and electrical conductivity (EC) (2.651 ± 0.039 mS/cm) values. Elevated dissolved oxygen (DO) (3.72 ± 0.04 mg/L) was observed in the hot water soaking (60 °C) due to the reduction of soaking duration of up to 2 h. By contrast, the SAS maintained a nearly neutral pH (7.35 ± 0.01) and lower turbidity (510.0 ± 1.4 NTU) level compared to the hot water soaking process. The leaching rates and moisture absorption were computed using pseudo-second-order leaching kinetics and Peleg model absorption kinetics, and a higher leaching rate (0.081 g/L min) was detected at 60 °C. The SAS produced higher efficiency with less resource consumption and an environmentally advantageous approach by reducing effluent strength and maintaining total solids in paddy grains. The new knowledge created by the comprehensive evaluation CS, SAS, and hot water soaking of paddy parboiling using leaching models and paddy hydration adds new insights to the development of efficient paddy parboiling methods.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.