Abstract

Abstract. A set of nozzle and water dispersion devices were designed to obtain a desirable jet breakup and save water from an impact sprinkler (IS) at low pressure conditions. Comparative performance indicators were obtained for the commercial LP and IS sprinkler heads. Results show that under the same working conditions, the IS produced a large spray range and the water distribution in the middle of the spray range (R) was better than the LP. The best simulated uniformity from the IS was obtained for the combined spacing factor of 1.4*R and the combined uniformity was 4% larger than the LP. Considering the middle position of the spray range, the number and diameter of the droplets from the IS were larger than the droplets from the LP. However, in the end position of the spray range, the droplet diameters from the IS were quite smaller than the LP. Velocities from IS ranged between 0.2 and 6.4 m/s, while that from LP sprinkler were slightly higher ranging from 0.15 to 7.7 m/s at 150 kPa. Overall, introduction of the fixed dispersion device with a pointed tip profile combined with the 6 mm nozzle offered some advantages for the IS over the LP sprinkler at low-pressure conditions. Keywords: Dispersion device, Droplet distribution, Impact sprinkler, Low pressure sprinkler, Nozzle, Spray range, Uniformity.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call