Abstract
ABSTRACTDental cements including the glass ionomer cement (GIC) have found widespread use in restoring tooth structures. In this study, modifications of glass ionomer cements (GICs) were made by adding bioactive glass (BAG) to GIC to obtain bioactive restorative materials. This study used polarized light microscopy (PLM) to examine the remineralization effects of the study materials on dentin. It also evaluated the Vickers microhardness of the experimental materials. Experimental glass ionomer cement (GIC)-BAG materials were made by mixing 10 wt% of BAG particles with conventional cure and resin-modified GIC powders. Class V restorations were made in 80 extracted mandibular teeth which included 4 groups of 20 teeth each. 100 |jm sections of the teeth were examined under polarized light microscope after undergoing pH cycling. Materials were also processed into 80 cylindrical specimens and immersed in water for 7 and 30 days before mechanical tests. Resin-modified GIC containing BAG showed a thick uniform layer of mineralization on the restoration-dentin interface. The conventional cure GIC-based materials had higher surface microhardness than the resin-modified materials.Significance: The addition of BAG to GIC compromises the mechanical properties of the materials to some extent. Thus, their clinical use ought to be restricted to applications where their bioactivity can be beneficial, such as root surface fillings and liners in dentistry.
Highlights
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in restorative dentistry.[1]
It was never studied whether deep lesions, extending into dentine, can be remineralized if such lesions are subjected to a continuous remineralization scheme.[37]
The first objective of this study was to test if glass ionomer cement containing bioactive glass produced remineralization
Summary
Glass ionomer cements (GICs) are widely used in restorative dentistry.[1]. In dentistry, one of their advantages over other restorative materials is that they can be placed into tooth cavities without an additional bonding agent.[2]. One problem is that they do not always bond sufficiently to enamel and dentin. The mechanical strength decreased significantly when the paste is exposed to saliva at the initial stage of setting. To overcome this drawback, conventional glass ionomer cement was modified by water soluble resin.[6] These resin modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) provided improved mechanical properties and adhesion, better esthetics, easier application with reduced moisture sensitivity and immediate light cure after placement.[7] They were mostly found to have a potential for releasing fluoride in equivalent amounts as conventional glass ionomer cements.[8]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.