Comparative Evaluation of the Antiplaque Eff ect of unprocessed Honey Mouthwash, Manuka Honey Mouthwash and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash

Abstract

Background: The importance of honey for medicinal purposes is well documented in world’s oldest literature. Manukahoney is gaining attention for its effectiveness against a wide range of pathogens. Aim: Comparative evaluation of the anti - plaque effect of Manuka honey mouthwash and unprocessed honey mouthwash with chlorhexidine mouthwash. Objectives: To assess antiplaque effect of Manuka honey, raw (unprocessed) honey mouthwash and to compare antiplaque effect of Manuka honey mouthwash and unprocessed honey mouthwash to chlorhexidine mouthwash (gold standard). Study Design :Double‑blind, randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: 30periodontally healthy subjects between the age group 18 and24years were randomly allocated to 3 groups : Raw honey (RH), Manuka honey (MH) , and Chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash groups. The four day plaque regrowth model was used and plaque scores were assessed using the S. Turesky modification of Quigley Hein Plaque Index. Results :A significant increase in the mean plaque scores at baseline, that is, after scaling and at 5 days in all the three groups. Conclusion : Thus,Manuka honey mouthwash and unprocessed honey mouthwash are potent antiplaque agents and can be used as natural alternatives to chlorhexidine. Key Words Inflammation, Honey, Plaque, Chlorhexidine.