Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare in vitro, the accuracy of two different electronic apex locators, i.e., Propex PixiTM and CanalProTM in primary anterior teeth. Methodology: A total of 60 primary teeth sample has been selected using a convenience sampling method. Samples were divided into two experimental groups in which, Group 1 belong to Propex PixiTM apex locator, and Group 2 CanalProTM. The mean values with standard deviations of electronic working length by using Propex PixiTM and CanalProTM with that of stereomicroscopic actual working length were calculated and compared Results: There was statistically significant difference between values obtained by the two electronic apex locators and actual length Conclusion: A strong correlation was seen between the two electronic methods and AL and also in between the two EALs, showing the possibility of their use to measure the root canal length.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
