Comparative evaluation of ten different condylar base fracture osteosynthesis techniques

Abstract

The aim of this study on the mandibles of minipigs was to compare the biomechanical stability of different methods of osteosynthesis that are used in the operative treatment of fractures of the base of the condyle. Ten different systems of osteosynthesis were used to fix 164 fractures, which were tested by a two-point bending test after repositioning and fixing. This stress test was applied in four directions: lateral to medial, anterior to distal, distal to anterior, and medial to lateral. The Eckelt lag screw, one or two 2.0 mm miniplates, one miniplate with bar (KLS Martin), minicompression plates (Medicon), zygoma compression plates (Medartis), condylus fracture plates (Medartis), square 4-hole plates (KLS Martin), and either one or two resorbable 4-hole miniplates (Resorb-X, Martin) were used for osteosynthesis. A total of 164 tests were done using a universal test machine that measured forces until the osteosynthesis failed. Advantages in mechanical load capacity were also measured for the Eckelt lag screw when force was applied from medial to lateral. Fixation with one resorbable miniplate was not functionally stable. Irrespective of the direction of force applied, two miniplates were the most stable technique. There were pronounced differences depending on the direction of force applied. The results suggest that treatment with a single resorbable miniplate is not functionally stable.