Abstract

In heterogeneous traffic conditions, roundabout capacity is described by vehicle and driver characteristics which are different from traffic conditions in homogeneous conditions. In the present study, the capacity of the roundabout is determined using various capacity formulas such as gap acceptance models given by Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (US), German model (2001); empirical regression models given by TRRL (UK) and weaving models given by IRC: 65–1976 (India). In addition, microscopic simulation model like VISSIM (PTV Germany) is also used to derive capacity values. Unlike the other capacity estimation models, VISSIM is helpful in estimating capacity values using geometric and driver characteristics and it can also simulate heterogeneous traffic condition accurately. Capacity is estimated after calibrating the simulation model (VISSIM) developed for the roundabout. This is achieved by incorporating different vehicle classes to represent the heterogeneous traffic environment, driver gap acceptance, and lane change parameters. All the required inputs were extracted from the video using semi-automatic data collection methods. Data are used for the estimation of capacity values from different methods mentioned above and for the calibration and validation of simulation model. The capacity values estimated form various formulas except German model are distinctly different from the field values and they are either overestimating or underestimating. Analysis of these observations reveals that the capacity values from VISSIM and German models are nearly matching with the field capacity.

Highlights

  • Roundabouts have many advantages compared to other regular signalized intersections

  • In heterogeneous traffic conditions, roundabout capacity is described by vehicle and driver characteristics which are different from traffic conditions in homogeneous conditions

  • The capacity of the roundabout is determined using various capacity formulas such as gap acceptance models given by Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (US), German model (2001); empirical regression models given by TRRL (UK) and weaving models given by IRC: 65–1976 (India)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Roundabouts have many advantages compared to other regular signalized intersections. Signalized intersection has 32 conflict points whereas roundabout with one circulating lane and one entry lane has 8 traffic conflict points. The number of conflicts increases to 16 in the case of roundabout with two circulating and two entry lanes. The reduced number of conflict points at a roundabout indicates the reduction of crash propensity. For the safe movement of the vehicles, it is essential to understand the operational performance of the roundabout.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call