Abstract

Nine patients with fresh burns were treated with povidone-iodine aerosol foam solution and matched with 9 patients with fresh burns of similar extent and distribution treated with silver sulphadiazine cream. Severe pain at the time of application of povidoneiodine was a constant complaint. The wounds of 7 patients treated with povidone-iodine had been colonized by bacteria by day 11 post burn, whereas the wounds of only 2 patients treated with silver sulpha-diazine had been colonized at the corresponding time. Gram-negative organisms appeared more frequently, earlier and in higher concentrations in the povidoneiodine treated patients ( Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 4 patients), whereas Staphylococcus aureus was more frequent with silver sulphadiazine (4 patients). Five of the povidone-iodine treated patients had developed burn wound sepsis by day 11 post burn, whereas no silver sulphadiazine treated patient developed burn wound sepsis. For this reason, further evaluation of povidone-iodine foam as a prophylactic topical antibacterial for burns was abandoned.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.