Abstract
In mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, the differences in the analytical results from different laboratories/machines are an issue to be considered because various types of machines are used in each laboratory. Moreover, the analytical methods are unique to each laboratory. It is important to understand the reality of inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics. Therefore, we have evaluated whether the differences in analytical methods, with the exception sample pretreatment and including metabolite extraction, are involved in the inter-laboratory differences or not. In this study, nine facilities are evaluated for inter-laboratory comparisons of metabolomic analysis. Identical dried samples prepared from human and mouse plasma are distributed to each laboratory, and the metabolites are measured without the pretreatment that is unique to each laboratory. In these measurements, hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites are analyzed using 11 and 7 analytical methods, respectively. The metabolomic data acquired at each laboratory are integrated, and the differences in the metabolomic data from the laboratories are evaluated. No substantial difference in the relative quantitative data (human/mouse) for a little less than 50% of the detected metabolites is observed, and the hydrophilic metabolites have fewer differences between the laboratories compared with hydrophobic metabolites. From evaluating selected quantitatively guaranteed metabolites, the proportion of metabolites without the inter-laboratory differences is observed to be slightly high. It is difficult to resolve the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics because all laboratories cannot prepare the same analytical environments. However, the results from this study indicate that the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomic data are due to measurement and data analysis rather than sample preparation, which will facilitate the understanding of the problems in metabolomics studies involving multiple laboratories.
Highlights
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics have been widely applied to a variety of research fields, targeting microorganisms, plants, animals, and humans, to understand metabolism in the body [1,2,3,4]
In MS-based metabolomics, the differences in the analytical results from laboratories/machines are issues to be considered; these issues are seen in other omics technologies
It seems that proteomics is proceeding in the direction of analyzing proteomic data acquired using different mass spectrometers with the same software for the data integrated evaluation
Summary
Mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics have been widely applied to a variety of research fields, targeting microorganisms, plants, animals, and humans, to understand metabolism in the body [1,2,3,4]. When small-scale studies based on MS-based metabolomics are carried out, it is sufficient to proceed with metabolomics in one laboratory; in these cases, there is no particular problem with using only one mass spectrometer or protocols optimized at one laboratory. Large-scale studies often require metabolomic analyses using various types of mass spectrometers in multiple laboratories. In these situations, data integration between laboratories is an issue to be considered. It has been reported that the use of different metabolomics platforms in biomarker studies based on non-targeted metabolomics results in low confidence in the reproducibility of the results [8]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
