Comparative evaluation of one-handed versus two-handed mask holding techniques in children during inhalational induction of anesthesia: A randomized crossover study.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate if two-handed mask airway is superior to one-handed mask airway during inhalational induction of anesthesia in children. A randomized, two period, crossover study was performed on 60 children aged 1-8years, with obstructive sleep apnea due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy, scheduled for adenotonsillectomy. Children were assigned to two study sequences and one control sequence of 20 subjects each. A control sequence was added to evaluate the effect of anesthetic depth. Sequence 1: One-handed followed by two-handed airway, 30seconds each; Sequence 2: two-handed followed by one-handed airway, 30seconds each and Sequence 3: two-handed airway, for 60seconds. The work of breathing indices, phase angle, and labored breathing index were recorded using respiratory inductance plethysmography. Additional outcome measures were tidal volume, minute ventilation, and respiratory rate. A straight comparison and a crossover analysis was performed. The initial comparison revealed that one-handed airway had greater phase angle (mean diff. 17.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-33.68; P=.034), greater labored breathing index (mean diff. 0.56; 95% CI 0.16-1.04; P=.004),lower minute ventilation (mean diff. -1567; 95% CI -2695 to -5.4; P=.004),and lower tidal volume (mean diff. -39; 95% CI -2.7 to -5.4; P=.02) than two-handed airway. On crossover analysis, within-subject difference in the phase angle was greater during one-handed than two-handed airway (34.3; 95% CI 8.46-60.14; P=.01) as was labored breathing index (mean diff. 1.2; 95% CI 0.39-2.00; P<.0046).Minute ventilation was lower during one-handed than two-handed airway (mean diff. -3359; 95% CI -4363 to -2355, P<0.0001) as was tidal volume(mean diff. -78; 95% CI -110.4 to -45.8; P<.0001). In children with obstructive sleep apnea due to adenotonsillar hypertrophy, two-handed airway provides superior airway patency that was not influenced by the anesthetic depth.