Comparative evaluation of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation vs nasal intermittent ventilation in postoperative paediatric patients operated for acyanotic congenital cardiac defects

Abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to compare high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygenation vs nasal intermittent ventilation (NIV) oxygenation for respiratory care after extubation in postoperative paediatric cardiac patients. MethodsThis study was a randomised controlled trial. One hundred twenty-one paediatric patients with acyanotic congenital heart disease undergoing corrective cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass were included in the study. Patients were randomised to receive either HFNC (AIRVO) or NIV (RAM Cannula) postextubation. Arterial blood gas was analysed at different time points perioperatively. ResultsPatients in both the groups were matched with respect to diagnosis and demographic profiles. Baseline hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were also similar in both the groups. Patients in HFNC/AIRVO group did not show improved carbon dioxide (CO2) washout but showed improved pO2 and pO2/FiO2 ratio immediate postextubation. Reintubation rate and other intensive care unit (ICU) complications were similar in both the groups. ConclusionPostcardiopulmonary bypass respiratory complications in paediatric patients with congenital acyanotic heart disease can be minimised with newer oxygen therapy devices such as AIRVO (HFNC) or RAM cannula (NIV). In comparison between these two, AIRVO did not show improved CO2 washout over RAM cannula; however, it did provide better oxygenation as measured by pO2 in arterial blood and pO2/FiO2 ratio immediate postextubation. Also, long-term results such as duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay were not affected by the choice of device.