Abstract

PurposeTo compare and evaluate the fracture strength recovery of fractured teeth using the combination of reattachment techniques (simple reattachment, over contour and internal dentinal groove) and bonding adhesives (Super-Bond C & B and Calibra Universal). Materials and methodsSeventy human central incisors gathered from dental clinics in Ranchi and Hazaribag, Jharkhand, India, were randomly divided into 3 groups (G-I to G-III); G-I (n = 10) being the control group, only the test groups G-II and G-III (n = 30 each) were fractured using diamond disc and bonded with Super-Bond C & B and Calibra Universal respectively. These two groups were further sub-grouped into 3 each based on the reattachment techniques used. Post reattachment, the specimens were tested for fracture strength recovery and the data obtained was evaluated using One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison tests. ResultsThere was statistically significant difference of fracture strength recovery between control (G-I) and the experimental groups (G-II and G-III), P<0.0001. Comparison between the experimental groups revealed the fractured teeth reattached with Super Bond C&B showed highest fracture strength recovery compared to Calibra Universal. Among the different preparation techniques applied, the over contour technique combined with Super-Bond C & B showed the maximum fracture strength recovery attaining 92% fracture resistance as that of the control specimens. ConclusionThough none of the combinations of adhesives and techniques have achieved the fracture strength recovery as that of the intact teeth, Super-Bond C & B showed better performance compared with Calibra Universal in combination with the techniques used in the current study. Further, Super-Bond C & B combined with over contour technique showed the highest fracture strength recovery.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call