Abstract
Objective: Closing wounds are a fundamental aspect of surgery. Both patients and surgeons hope that no scars remain once a wound has healed. This study examined the effectiveness of cyanoacrylate and suture material in closing operational skin wounds in terms of time required for closure of the operative incision and problems associated with it. Methods: Forty-two individuals who had emergency surgery participated in this comparative analysis. The study evaluated how the identical patient’s abdominal incisions were closed on the skin. Relevant surgical information, such as signs of inflammation, discomfort, possible discharge, wound dehiscence, and sinus, was recorded both during and after the operation. Results: In the adhesive application group, it took 1.5 min (95 s), but it took 4.1 min (248 s) in suturing group for the closure of a <5-cm incision. Of the 32 patients in the adhesive group, 4 (12.5%) showed erythema and warmth, 3 (9.3%) showed discomfort, and 6 (18.7%) showed discharge. All other problems, excluding dehiscence, were less severe in the sticky group. Conclusion: For patients undergoing emergency laparotomies, cyanoacrylate appears to be a safe and cost-effective alternative to sutures. For a conclusive outcome, a high number of case groups are needed, but the observed results were only on a small number of case groups.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.