Comparative Evaluation of Different Retreatment Files for Gutta-percha Removal from Curved Root Canals Accessed with Novel Ultra-conservative Opening: An In-vitro Study

Abstract

Introduction: In endodontic retreatment, gutta-percha removal must be done correctly in order to assure a successful outcome following failed procedures. The goal of this study was to compare the effectiveness of stainless-steel hand files with three different nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems for removing guttapercha using ultra-conservative access opening in curved canals. Aim: To compare the efficacy of different rotary instruments for removing obturating material from root canals with Ninja access in mandibular mesiobuccal moderately curved canals measured radiographically using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: An in-vitro study was conducted in the Conservative and Endodontics department, Karnavati School of Dentistry, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India in the time period of June 2022 to July 2022. Forty extracted human mandibular molar teeth were accessed through Ultraconservative opening (Ninja Access). After preparing the root canals, they were sealed using gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer through lateral compaction. The teeth were then stored for one week. The samples were divided into four groups according to the rotary file used: Group I- Hedstrom Files; Group II- Pro taper Universal Retreatment (PTUR) Files; Group III- Neoendo Retreatment Files; Group IV- R-Endo Retreatment. The amount of remaining filling material after the retreatment procedure was checked with CBCT. The statistical analysis was performed using R statistical analysis software version 4.1.0 for windows. Results: In sagittal section, there was significant difference of residual filling material between the four file systems in middle third only (p=0.048) while significant difference was seen only in apical third in the coronal section (p=0.011). However, the three rotary retreatment files left significantly less remnants than Hedström files during removal of the gutta-percha. The time taken for retreatment was significantly higher for Hedström files (398.90±20.717) sec followed by R-endo retreatment files (274.30±14.407). Conclusion: H file was the least effective in removing guttapercha from the canals when compared to the other three file systems. The Neo-Endo rotary retreatment system was faster.