Abstract

Environmental DNA and RNA (eDNA and eRNA; collectively eNA) analyses have the potential for non-invasive and cost-efficient biomonitoring compared with traditional capture-based surveys. Although various types of eNA particles, including not only mitochondrial eDNA but also nuclear eDNA and their transcripts, are present in the water, performances of eNA detection and quantification have not yet been evaluated sufficiently across multiple mitochondrial and nuclear genes. We conducted a tank experiment with ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis) to compare the detection sensitivity, yields per water sample, and quantification variability between replicates of each type of eNAs. The assay targeting the multi-copy nuclear gene exhibited a higher sensitivity than the assay targeting the mitochondrial gene, and both the target eDNA and eRNA concentrations per water sample were higher for the nuclear gene. On the contrary, variation in eRNA quantifications per sample does not necessarily correspond to that in eDNA, and the intra-sample quantification variability (represented as the CVs between PCR replicates) tended to be larger for eRNA than eDNA. Our results suggested that, even if suitable to the sensitive detection of species occurrence, the use of eRNA particularly derived from multi-copy nuclear gene may not be necessarily appropriate for the reliable assessment of species abundance. The findings in this study would help optimize eNA analyses for making biomonitoring and stock assessment in aquatic environments more efficient and reliable.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call