Comparative evaluation and analysis of outcomes in non-idiopathic and idiopathic clubfeet with Ponseti method at a tertiary care centre of a developing country

Abstract

BackgroundIdiopathic clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus, CTEV) is being managed worldwide by Ponseti method with high success rates, while for non-idiopathic clubfoot surgical interventions is being widely used with variable results. This study evaluated the effectiveness of Ponseti method in non-idiopathic clubfoot and compared the results with idiopathic clubfoot. MethodsThe paper evaluated the epidemiological incidence and demographic profile of non-idiopathic clubfoot in a tertiary centre of developing country. A total of 108 subjects with 85 having idiopathic (group I;125 feet) and 23 having non-idiopathic variety (group II;34 feet) were managed with Ponseti method and were followed for a mean duration of 38.33 (12–62) and 36.27 months (12–58) in group I and II respectively. The most common associations were meningomyelocele (MMC/spina bifida,5), arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC,4), developmental dysplasia of hip (DDH,3) and Down’s syndrome and amniotic band syndrome (2 each). ResultsPrimary correction was achieved in both the groups in 98% and 87% in group I and II respectively, while recurrences of at least one deformity was observed in 11 (9%) and 12 (40%) feet in group I and II respectively. Favourable outcomes were noticed in 22 (65%) feet in non-idiopathic group and 12 feet (35%) underwent extensive soft tissue release as compared to 3 feet (2.4%) in idiopathic variety. ConclusionDeformities improved significantly in non-idiopathic clubfeet with Ponseti methods although complete correction was not possible. Extensive surgical interventions were reduced in up to 35% feet in non-idiopathic variety and hence, it is recommended as primary treatment for all variety of clubfeet, irrespective of their etiology.