Abstract

Simple SummaryLucerne (Medicago sativa L.) is a cross-pollinated crop and pollination does not usually take place until the sexual column is released. The discharge of the sexual column is referred to as ‘tripping’ the flower. In this study, several bee species were investigated to facilitate the pollination of lucerne crop with a purpose to examine the pollination efficiencies of native insect pollinators that lead to a seed set of alfalfa. We designed a two-year field trial to investigate the abundance and diversity of insect pollinators along with foraging behavior in terms of stay time, visitation rate, pollen harvest and tripping efficiency. Moreover, the single-visit efficiency in terms of number of seeds per pod, germination and seed yield was evaluated. Ten major pollinators (five solitary bees, three honeybees and two flies) were tested for their pollination efficiency as effective pollinators. Findings show the solitary bees (Megachile cephalotes, Megachile hera, Amegilla sp.) can be recommended as an effective pollinator for this crop, thus increasing options available to seed growers. For lucerne seed development, more consideration should be paid to the variety of native wild bees, conservation strategies and foraging requirements in establishing a diverse pollination system rather than a single bee species.Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) is a cross-pollinated crop and requires entomophilous pollination for tripping of flowers and subsequent pod and seed set. To discover the best pollinators for lucerne seed production, a two-year field trial was carried out at the research farm of MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan. Abundance and diversity of insect pollinators along with the foraging behavior were recorded in terms of tripping efficiency, stay time, visitation rate and pollen harvest. The single-visit efficiency of abundant insect pollinators was also evaluated in terms of number of seeds and seed weight per raceme along with germination percentage. Ten most abundant floral visitors (five solitary bee species, three honeybee species and two syrphid fly species) were tested for their pollination efficiency. Honeybees were most abundant in both the years followed by the solitary bees and syrphid flies. Single-visit efficacy in terms of number of pods per raceme, number of seeds per raceme, 1000 seed weight and germination percentage revealed Megachile cephalotes as the most efficient insect pollinator followed by Megachile hera and Amegilla sp. Future studies should investigate the biology and ecology of these bee species with special emphasis on their nesting behavior and seasonality.

Highlights

  • Introduction conditions of the Creative CommonsInsect pollination is essential for the sustainability of both agricultural and natural ecosystems since 87% of flowering plants and nearly 35% of crops worldwide are dependent on insect and other pollinators [1,2]

  • The purpose of this study was to assess the biodiversity of native insect pollinators along with comparing their pollination efficiency in order to find the best native pollinators for lucerne seed production

  • Honeybees were most abundant followed by solitary bees and flies in both years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Insect pollination is essential for the sustainability of both agricultural and natural ecosystems since 87% of flowering plants and nearly 35% of crops worldwide are dependent on insect and other pollinators [1,2]. The insect pollinators due to their distinctive characteristics [2,3,4]. Both managed and wild bees provide pollination services to the vast majority of fruits, vegetables, forage crops (alfalfa and clovers), oil-producing crops [5] and wild flowering plants [6]. Known as alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), is a cross-pollinated crop. Pollination is a key limitation in alfalfa seed production Because of its high nutritional content, adaptability, good quality characteristics and herbage yield, it is one of the most valuable source as fodder grown in more than 80 countries [7,8,9,10,11,12,13].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call