Abstract

A total of 400 head of naturally parasitized commercial feedyard cattle (subset of 40 hd/pen; 10 pens) were utilized to compare trade name ivermectin pour-on and a generic ivermectin pour-on. The efficacy of each product was measured by obtaining rectal fecal egg counts on day 0 and day 14 using a Modified Wisconsin sugar float with centrifugation from rectal fecal samples and calculating fecal egg reduction post treatment. There were no differences in net egg count reduction between treatments (P= 0.15) at 14 days post-treatment application. Regardless of treatment, only 26% of animals had a fecal egg count reduction of >90% and only 35% achieved a FECR of >80% which is low considering 90% reduction is the accepted efficacy level. Cattle treated with the generic pour-on had improved average daily gains (ADG) compared to cattle treated with the trade name pour-on P = 0.02. This study demonstrated decreased efficacy of both products with a FECR of less than 90% within a commercial feedyard environment.

Highlights

  • Generic products generally have a cost advantage for beef producers over brand-name products

  • The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of Vetrimec

  • No anthelmintic treatment × pen interactions occurred for fecal egg count reduction percentages or performance

Read more

Summary

Part of the Other Animal Sciences Commons

Recommended Citation Tarpoff, A.J.; Guichon, T.; Thomson, Daniel U.; Wileman, Benjamin W.; and Reinhardt, Christopher D. (2012) "Comparative efficacy of two Ivermectin Pour-on anthelmintics in beef steers in a commercial feedyard," Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: Vol 0: Iss. 1.

Introduction
Experimental Procedures
Results and Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.