Abstract

Introduction Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) imposes a huge economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) are widely used to treat AECOPD. In this study, we examined the efficacy of CHIs in the treatment of AECOPD using a network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods Literature search was conducted from electronic databases of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CHIs plus Western medicine (WM) versus WM. WinBUGS 1.4.3 and STATA 12.0 were adopted to compute calculations and prepare graphs, respectively. Results We included 155 RCTs with 13,218 patients. The results revealed that Danhong injection (DH) + WM had the greatest therapeutic potential in terms of rate of clinical efficacy (RCE). In addition, in comprehensively improving RCE and FEV1%, and RCE and C-reactive protein, Huangqi injection (HQ) +WM was associated with preferable effects. Similarly, Xixinnao injection + WM, Reduning injection (RDN) +WM, and HQ+WM had a favorable effect on RCE and PaO2. The effect of RDN+WM was favorable in all outcomes except RCE. The safety of CHIs needs to be further assessed. Conclusions Based on this NMA, DH+WM, HQ+WM, and RDN+WM were potential optimal therapies in AECOPD and their safety should be strictly monitored.

Highlights

  • Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) imposes a huge economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide

  • Twelve Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) were included in the analysis, namely, Tanreqing injection (TRQ), Xuebijing injection (XBJ), Danhong injection (DH), Shenmai injection (SM), Reduning injection (RDN), Chuanxiongqin injection (CXQ), Chuankezhi injection (CKZ), Xiyanping injection (XYP), Shenfu injection (SF), Xixinnao injection (XXN), Huangqi injection (HQ), and Shengmai injection (SMI)

  • DH+Western medicine (WM) was more efficacious than SF+WM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) imposes a huge economic burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Recent surveys reported that traditional Chinese medicine is effective in relieving clinical symptoms, improving lung function, reducing inflammation, shortening acute exacerbation, and improving quality of life [9,10,11,12]. It has an excellent safety profile [11]. Traditional pair-wise meta-analysis reviews manifested that numerous CHIs could be used to treat AECOPD with favorable efficacy [14,15,16,17,18]. We conducted a NMA to reveal which is the best CHI for treating AECOPD to provide evidence of evidence-based medicine for decision-making

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call