Abstract
A total of 178 patients participated in a 14-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel study to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of single daily doses of 200, 300 and 400 mg of bepridil hydrochloride and placebo in the treatment of patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. The results showed that weekly angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption were significantly reduced from baseline levels with all doses of bepridil (p < 0.01), and the reductions were consistently greater than those in the placebo group. For the 400-mg dose the reductions in angina attacks and nitroglycerin consumption were significantly greater (p ≤ 0.05) than those in the placebo group at all but 1 evaluation point. Exercise tolerance improved significantly during bepridil administration (p ≤ 0.05), and a significant linear dose response was noted for total exercise time, total work and time to onset of angina. In addition, bepridil was significantly superior to placebo for these parameters at doses of 300 (p ≤ 0.05) and 400 mg (p ≤ 0.01). There were small reductions in heart rate (mean 3.7 beats/min) and prolongation of QT and QTc intervals (approximately 30 to 40 milliseconds) associated with bepridil treatment. Bepridil was well tolerated by patients in this study. When adverse effects occurred, they most frequently involved the gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. Of the patients receiving bepridil, 6% discontinued therapy because of adverse effects. The study demonstrates that bepridil given once a day at doses ranging from 200 to 400 mg was safe and effective in the treatment of stable angina pectoris.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.