Abstract

Knowing and managing the cross cultural and multi-disciplinary benefits and limitations of comparative effectiveness research (CER) will be the key component in building a strong foundation for the proof of concept in precision medicine. Unprecedented funding for CER is now available but this often favors national applicants even though the research is completed in other nations. There is a spill-over effect into low and middle income countries (LMIC), where device manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, and regenerative technology corporations are investing in for the benefits of reduced site costs, supplies, and faster turn around times.Corporations ostensibly enjoy the opportunity to work in relative obscurity, thus protecting the proprietary aspects of development in a more lenient regulatory milieu with reduced ethical scrutiny.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.