Abstract

It is unknown whether initiating renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor therapy in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is superior to alternative antihypertensive agents such as calcium channel blockers (CCBs). We compared the risks for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with advanced CKD in routine nephrology practice who were initiating either RAS inhibitor or CCB therapy. Observational study in the Swedish Renal Registry, 2007 to2017. 2,458 new users of RAS inhibitors and 2,345 CCB users with estimated glomerular filtration rates<30mL/min/1.73m2 (CKD G4-G5 without KRT) who were being followed up by a nephrologist. As a positive control cohort, new users of the same drugs with CKD G3 (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30-60mL/min/1.73m2) were evaluated. RAS inhibitor versus CCB therapy initiation. Initiation of KRT (maintenance dialysis or transplantation), all-cause mortality, and MACE (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke). HRs with 95% CIs were estimated using propensity score-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression adjusting for demographic, clinical, and laboratory covariates. Median age was 74 years, 38% were women, and median follow-up was 4.1 years. After propensity score weighting, there was significantly lower risk for KRT after new use of RAS inhibitors compared with new use of CCBs (adjusted HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.69-0.89]) but similar risks for mortality (adjusted HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.88-1.07]) and MACE (adjusted HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.88-1.15]). Results were consistent across subgroups and in as-treated analyses. The positive control cohort of patients with CKD G3 showed similar KRT risk reduction (adjusted HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.56-0.80]) with RAS inhibitor therapy compared with CCBs. Potential confounding by indication. Our findings provide evidence from real-world clinical practice that initiation of RAS inhibitor therapy compared with CCBs may confer kidney benefits among patients with advanced CKD, with similar cardiovascular protection.

Highlights

  • calcium channel blocker (CCB) are frequently prescribed to treat hypertension, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).[26,27,28] calcium channel blockers (CCBs) were used as an active comparator to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in trials such as AASK

  • In a population-based Swedish database, we studied the clinical outcomes of starting renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor or calcium channel blocker (CCB) therapy in patients with advanced CKD who were using neither and were followed up by a nephrologist

  • Compared with CCBs, RAS inhibitor therapy initiation was associated with lower risk for kidney replacement therapy but similar risks for mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings suggest that RAS inhibitor therapy initiation might slow the progression of kidney disease compared with CCBs in patients with advanced CKD and offer similar cardiovascular protection

Read more

Summary

Objectives

Our goal was to inform on the choice of antihypertensive agents in the advanced CKD population by comparing outcomes associated with initiating RAS inhibitor or CCB therapy as the 2 most commonly used antihypertensive agents in clinical practice.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call