Abstract

In the Guidance for Industry from the Food and Drug Administration in 2008, excess cardiovascular risk should be ruled out in trials of all new antidiabetic drugs; however, relatively few studies have focused on cardiovascular safety with antidiabetic drug use. We aimed to examine mortality and cardiovascular risk using a network meta-analysis. We searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry databases in March 2016 to identify randomized controlled trials reporting cardiovascular risk with the following oral antidiabetic drugs: metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinedione (TZD), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. We assessed the differences in the risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular-related mortality, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and myocardial infarction (MI) among antidiabetic drugs with fixed effect models for direct pairwise comparisons and Bayesian network meta-analyses to integrate direct and indirect comparisons. Of the 101,183 patients in 73 randomized controlled trials, 3,434 (3.4%) died. The relative risks of all-cause mortality with SGLT2 inhibitor use were 0.68 (95% credible interval: 0.57–0.80), 0.74 (0.49–1.10), 0.63 (0.46–0.87), 0.71 (0.55–0.90), and 0.65 (0.54–0.78), compared with placebo, metformin, sulfonylurea, TZD, and DPP4 inhibitor, respectively. The relative risks of cardiovascular-related mortality with SGLT2 inhibitor use were 0.61 (0.50–0.76), 0.81(0.36–1.90), 0.52(0.31–0.88), 0.66(0.49–0.91), and 0.61(0.48–0.77), compared with placebo, metformin, sulfonylurea, TZD, and DPP4 inhibitor, respectively. The relative risks of ACS with SGLT2 inhibitor use was consistent with that of all-cause mortality. SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a lower risk of ACS than the other OADs and placebo. The relative risks of MI with SGLT2 inhibitor use were 0.77 (0.63–0.93) and 0.75 (0.60–0.94), compared with placebo and DPP4 inhibitor, respectively. The currently available data provide the evidence of cardiovascular benefit from use of SGLT2 inhibitors to patients with type 2 diabetes, although additional results from ongoing studies will be pivotal.

Highlights

  • Diabetes, given the burden of associated morbidity and mortality [1], related to cardiovascular disease (CVD), is one of the most challenging diseases globally

  • S2 Table summarizes the characteristics of these 90 randomized controlled trial (RCT) of sulfonylureas, metformin, TZDs, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors

  • The comparison-adjusted funnel plot of cardiovascular-related mortality, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and myocardial infarction (MI) depicted were quite symmetric, meaning rare small-study effects in the network. In this network meta-analysis, we identified 90 RCTs that reported the risk of all-cause mortality or adverse cardiovascular outcomes for oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Given the burden of associated morbidity and mortality [1], related to cardiovascular disease (CVD), is one of the most challenging diseases globally. CVD prevention is a main goal of diabetes treatment. Intensive glycemic control reduces the overall microvascular complication rate by 25%, compared with conventional treatment [3]; the effect on macrovascular complications is unclear. There is concern about the cardiovascular safety of some oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). After Nissen and Wolski reported that rosiglitazone was likely to increase the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and cardiovascular-related mortality [4], the Food and Drug Administration issued an updated Guidance for Industry in 2008 requiring that pre- and post-approval studies for all new antidiabetic drugs rule out excess cardiovascular risk [5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call