Comparative effectiveness of endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery for patients with growth hormone secreting pituitary adenoma: An emulated trial

Abstract

IntroductionPrevious studies failed to show the benefit of endoscopic surgery over microscopic surgery in terms of early endocrine remission. This study was to investigate whether early endocrine outcomes in patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenoma underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery would be better than those operated by microscopic surgery. MethodsAn acromegaly database collected from 2010 to 2019 in a single institution was used to emulate a randomized trial. Adult patients operated by a transsphenoidal approach using either endoscope or microscope were included. The primary outcome was endocrine remission based on insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) at six-month follow-up after surgery. We used inverse probability weighting to construct a pseudo population from which the treatment effect was estimated. ResultsIn the original cohort, 1118 patients underwent transsphenoidal surgery (424 with an endoscopic approach and 694 with a microscopic approach). Patients treated with endoscopic surgery were more likely to be previously surgical treated and to have an invasive tumor than patients who underwent microscopic surgery. In the pseudo population, the proportion of endocrine remission was 54.9% in the endoscopic group and 42.0% in the microscopic group (odds ratio, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.27–2.23). This finding was consistent and robust across several sensitivity analyses. ConclusionsAmong patients with growth hormone secreting pituitary adenoma who underwent transsphenoidal surgery, endoscopic surgery was associated with higher early endocrine remission than microscopic surgery.