Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus.

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus is a complication of acute endomyocardial injury and chronic ventricular wall hypokinesis, resulting in increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Observational studies support the general safety and efficacy of warfarin for this indication. Limited data exists regarding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for LV thrombus. This retrospective cohort study sought to compare the incidence of thromboembolic events, bleeding rates, and blood product administration in patients receiving a DOAC versus warfarin. A total of 949 patients met inclusion, 180 (19%) received a DOAC and 769 (81%) warfarin. For the primary endpoint of new onset thromboembolic stroke, no difference existed between treatments (DOAC: 7.8% vs warfarin: 11.7%, p = 0.13). When compared to warfarin, no difference existed in the composite of thromboembolic events (33% vs 30.6%, p = 0.53, respectively) or in GUSTO bleeding (10.9% vs 7.8%, p = 0.40, respectively). More patients on warfarin received blood products compared to those taking a DOAC (25.8% vs 13.9%, p < 0.001).DOACs may be an alternative to warfarin for the treatment of LV thrombus based on a retrospective assessment of thromboembolic events and GUSTO bleeding events within 90days of diagnosis of LV thrombus. However, further prospective studies are warranted.