Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) acting on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or on its receptor are new therapeutic biologics to prevent chronic migraine (CM). Four mAbs acting on the CGRP or on its receptor are new therapeutic biologics to prevent CM. The aim of current network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of CGRP mAbs with onabotulinumtoxinA or topiramate for CM. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining CGRP mAbs and onabotulinumtoxinA or topiramate in patients with CM. All network meta-analytic procedures were conducted using the frequentist model. The primary outcomes were changes in the monthly migraine days and the 50% response rate. The safety was evaluated with acceptability (i.e., drop-out rate) and rate of any adverse event. This NMA of thirteen RCTs, which, in total, consisted of 5634 participants, demonstrated that a single 300mg of eptinezumab (mean difference = - 2.60days, 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) = - 4.43 to - 0.77 compared with placebo) demonstrated the best improvement in monthly migraine days among all interventions. In addition, 675mg fremanezumab in the first month followed by 225mg in the second and third months (odds ratio (OR) = 2.96, 95% CIs = 2.20 to 3.97 compared to placebo) was associated with the best response rate among all the interventions. Monthly 140mg erenumab (MD = - 2.50days, 95% CIs = - 3.83 to - 1.17 compared with placebo) was the best choice for reducing the number of acute migraine-specific medication use days. The safety analysis revealed that loading dose of 240mg galcanezumab and monthly 240mg (OR = 0.43, 95% CIs = 0.22 to 0.84) was associated with the lowest drop-out rate; loading dose fremanezumab 675mg and monthly 675mg (OR = 1.44, 95% CIs = 1.10 to 1.89), loading dose of 240mg galcanezumab and monthly 120mg (OR = 1.37, 95% CIs = 1.02 to 1.84), and single dose of fremanezumab 675mg (OR = 1.35, 95% CIs = 1.00 to 1.83) were associated with significantly higher rates of AEs than the placebo/control groups. Our NMA indicated that all four CGRP mAbs demonstrated excellent safety, acceptability, and efficacy profiles compared to the traditional prophylaxis for CM. However, because there are several limitations, the findings of the current NMA should be taken into consideration with caution.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.