Abstract

Objective: to provide the comparative characteristics of neurological impairments in infants born in the I and II obstetric positions and to follow them up in the neonatal period. Subjects and methods. A total of 133 infants born by vaginal delivery at 38–41 weeks» gestation in 2014 to 2016 were followed up. All the examinees were divided into 2 groups: 1) 71 neonates born in the I obstetric position; 2) 62 babies born in the II position. Their clinical examination encompassed an analysis of the course of delivery, neurological examination of the newborn in the first hours of life with a subsequent follow-up evaluation at the time of his/her discharge from the maternity unit. Results and discussion . The examined groups were comparatively analyzed in terms of a number of indicators. The data of objective neurological examination showed a significant difference in some symptoms: cephalohematoma and torticollis were more common in the group of infants born in the II position. Comparison of the frequency of neurological impairments at different follow-up stages (at birth and at discharge from the maternity unit) revealed their statistically significant reduction in both groups. However, the frequency of neurological symptoms among Group 1 infants (born in the I position) at their discharge from the maternity unit was significantly reduced (from 77.5 to 38.0 %; p < 0.001), and those in Group 2 infants (born in the II position) substantially unchanged (from 87.1 to 79.0 %; p = 0.125). The slight regression of neurological symptoms in Group 2 suggests that intranatal nervous system damage is more severe in the infants born in the II position. Conclusion . To define the position of a fetus during labor is an important component in the prevention of intranatal injuries

Highlights

  • Objective: to provide the comparative characteristics of neurological impairments in infants born in the I and II obstetric positions and to follow them up in the neonatal period

  • All the examinees were divided into 2 groups: 1) 71 neonates born in the I obstetric position; 2) 62 babies born in the II position

  • Their clinical examination encompassed an analysis of the course of delivery, neurological examination of the newborn in the first hours of life with a subsequent follow-up evaluation at the time of his/her discharge from the maternity unit

Read more

Summary

JOURNAL of NEUROLOGY

Сравнительная характеристика неврологического статуса детей, рожденных в I и II физиологических позициях. Несмотря на недостаточную изученность механизма родов при разных вариантах предлежания, авторы единодушны в признании очевидного факта – важности динамического осмотра новорожденного с первых часов жизни, топической диагностики ранних неврологических симптомов, а также в понимании того, что регрессия неврологической симптоматики у новорожденных не может свидетельствовать о полном благополучии [11]. При осмотре новорожденного в родильном доме признаки натальной травмы шейного отдела позвоночника и спинного мозга могут складываться из нескольких симптомокомплексов:. Результаты При сравнении оценки состояния новорожденного по шкале Апгар на 1-й и 5-й минутах после рождения в зависимости от позиции были получены следующие данные. Не установлено статистически значимых различий показателей в зависимости от позиции (p = 0,685 и p = 0,723 при сравнении оценок на 1-й и 5-й минутах соответственно). Data of the neurologic examination of newborns at the 1st day of life depending on the fetus position at birth

Всего Total
Stagnant facial cyanosis
При выписке At discharge
Синдром короткой шеи Short neck syndrome
Снижение проприоцептивных рефлексов Proprioceptive parareflexia
Findings
Всего по данным нейросонографии Total according to neurosonography data

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.